
Shedeur Sanders took a hit to the head during Colorado’s win over Colorado State in Fort Collins on Saturday night. The defender was not called for targeting even though it was a textbook targeting play.
College football officials are so inconsistent with this specific penalty that there is simply no way to know what is right and what is wrong at this point.
Lets start in Gainesville. Florida defensive back Trikweze Bridges was ejected from the contest against Texas A&M for targeting during the second half. He got downfield on a short pass to the flat and tackled Noah Thomas — around the waist — while the wide receiver was in the air.
The officials called this Targeting on Florida.
— Trey Wallace (@TreyWallace_) September 14, 2024
Bridges has been ejected, after tackling the Texas A&M receiver.
Really? pic.twitter.com/0ttuyQFaAQ
Upon further review, it was ruled that Bridges led with the crown of his helmet and launched. Southeastern Conference officials threw him out of the game as a result. Regardless of whether the call was right or wrong, the decision stood. The cornerback was ejected for targeting.
Now with that in mind, let’s take a look at the Buffaloes just a few hours later.
Rams defensive lineman Andrew Laurich crashed down on Shedeur Sanders just before halftime. He got to the quarterback one, if not two, full seconds after the ball had been released. His helmet initiated contact.
How in the hell isn’t that Laurich guy not thrown out the game for that CLEAR CROWN TO THE HELMET hit on Shedeur Sanders???
— Andrew Jerell Jones, Luke 1:37 (IG:twdbk3) (@sluggahjells) September 15, 2024
With all the bulls**t targeting ejections that are given, how isn’t THAT a targeting ejection???? pic.twitter.com/kYc3grykTe
Laurich was not called for targeting. Mountain West officials decided not remove him from the game. Nor did they issue a foul on Colorado State.
Even Gene Steratore, who never disagrees with the call on the field, was surprised by the decision. He saw it as a textbook targeting penalty where a defender led with his helmet and made contact with a defenseless player without the ball.
"I would've supported a targeting foul on that play." – @GeneSteratore on the hit Shedeur Sanders took pic.twitter.com/F6QAwv7cGg
— CBS Sports College Football 🏈 (@CBSSportsCFB) September 15, 2024
The disparity between the call in Florida and the no-call in Colorado is very confusing. Laurich’s hit was not ruled as targeting. Bridges’ hit was ruled as targeting.
Between the Florida ejection earlier and now the no call on Shedeur, targeting remains the most confusing rule in sports pic.twitter.com/T88ynNc1GZ
— Tony Clements (@TonyCMKE) September 15, 2024
Why? What’s the difference?
College football has a targeting problem and what we saw on Saturday is the perfect example. It is perhaps the most confusing rule in sports.